I received a letter yesterday which I found quite interesting. It was interesting in that it was anonymous, and because the writer saw my postings on the blog and some thing on the website as giving the impression that I was a very bitter person--bitter mostly towards the amateur photographers.
Anytime you get a letter unsigned, you have to ask yourself what was the persons motivation. Is it in an effort to help you, or in an attempt to hurt you. Either way, I did take note of it, and realized that I have been focusing a little too much effort on the amateurs, and if one reader sees this as bitter, others will also, so some explaining is in order.
First let me say that often times what is written is read in a different tone than what is was written in. Until you know the person that did the writing, you really are the one choosing the tone you read it in. In an English class in college, this was demonstrated to us with the sentence "I didn't throw her down the stairs". If you put the emphasis on "I" it implies someone else threw her down the stairs but it wasn't you. If the emphasis is put on "stairs" it's that you threw her down, but not down stairs. If you put the emphasis on "her" you are saying you threw someone else down the stairs, and so on.
The writer of the anonymous letter claimed to be in business for themselves, but not as a photographer; however, I did get the impression they might know someone who falls in the category of amateur professional photographer, and read my quips in a more slanderous tone when they were reading them.
Since the letter is anonymous, the only way to reply to the writer is here on the blog where this all got started in the first place. This will be my last post about the amateurs, as what I really need to say is going to be in this post.
The movie Jurassic Park had a great line in it, where Jeff Goldblum's character says something like, "Scientist ask themselves can we do it, before they ask themselves if they should do it". This is where I see the problem in photography today. When I started my business, I had worked for a commercial photographer in FL for a year, went to seminars by some of the best photographers in the country, invested in professional equipment--including lights, and knew how to use them, took courses in business to know how to price, learned how to do actual airbrushing, and had a business license. When I started my business 17 years ago, there were 6 full time photographers, and maybe 4 part time photographers. For 14 years, this stayed about the same, and we were all able to make a good living at a respectable profession.
Since anonymous says you are in business for yourself, I'd invite you to put yourself in my shoes, and the shoes of other professional photographers when I tell you what has happened in what used to be professional photography.
3 years ago, digital cameras became affordable, and smart enough that anyone could set the camera to program, and take a picture that was exposed well, and in focus. Computers were now cheap, and the need to take a picture right in the camera, got traded off to fixing the image in the computer afterward. Suddenly, we went from the 6 full time photographers and 4 part-timers, to 5 full-timers and 30+ part-timers. Imagine anonymous, if suddenly 25 more people jumped in to your line of business. Now that's pretty tough on any industry, but it also happened during the worst recession of my lifetime, and on top of that number, imagine if these 25 people were selling their products at a loss.
When I started my business 17 years ago, an 8x10 went for $20-$50. Those charging $20 really weren't making any money at it, and $35 seemed to be where the price needed to be to grow a business. The amateurs today price their 8x10 at $10! The reason they can do this, is because someone else is paying their living expenses, and they don't have a business license, so they aren't paying taxes.
Where the real problem comes in, is that with 25 people that are under trained, and under priced, they still are the majority, and majorities set new standards. So imagine anonymous if 25 people came into your industry with prices that were half that of what the lowest prices were 17 years ago, and there were so many that your industry itself started to unwind.
I know photographers all over the country that are going out of business, because of this. As for myself, I used to have two employees, and I just now hired one after a year without any, because the market is over-satruated, with people that aren't playing by the rules of business. Those rules being you're supposed to make money at it, and pay taxes on what you make.
As I said, they've become the majority now, and in most of my blog postings, I'm trying to educate people on what it is that's happening, and how it could effect them. What people see most now, are pictures with bad lighting, bad color, and a lot of special effects and touch-ups to try to make up for the problems that happen when you don't take a good picture in the first place. Suddenly "good enough" is becoming the new standard, and people are buying into pictures that they think are good, but in short order they will realize that "good enough" isn't very good at all. The problem with this is that by the time a senior realizes their senior pictures are really bad, it's too late to do them again, and the amateur photographers are hell bent on doing senior pictures. It's a one shot deal, and where before your choices were people that did a good job, now the greater majority are not. The reason for this is that too many people are saying I can be a photographer, before asking if they should become a photographer.
This is the last post I will make about the AWACs anonymous, so if your goal was to help me see the light, I saw it. I would however ask you to meet me in person though, because it's apparent that you don't know me at all, and I think after meeting me, you might read my posts more in the way that I wrote them, not in the way that you were reading them.